James Newton wrote:
> ...
>
> In general, from what I have seen of late, a lot of [OT] topics should be
> tagged [EE]  (in some way related to engineering) and [OT] is designed to
> include [WOT]. 
> ...
> --
> James.
>   
But, James, according to this post of yours on another thread, [EE] is 
defined as
Electronic Engineering, not Everything Engineering.  What's up with that?

James Newton wrote:
> ???
> As per
> http://www.piclist.com/techref/piclist/index.htm for a long time now... I
> just added "(unprovable beliefs)" after "religion" since I think that is a
> more clear definition of what religion is in my mind anyway. Let me know if
> that makes sense. The rest of this was already there...
> ...
> [EE] - mailto:piclist at mit.edu?subject=[EE] 
> This label is for topics that, while not necessarily about PICs, are of
> general interest to the Electronics Engineering community. How to hook
> something up to a microcontroller or other computer (not related to the PIC
> on board peripherals), analog circuitry, how to measure something, how
> something works, news about companies involved in EE, etc...
...


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist