All,

IMHO, who cares?  As long as they have the requisite tag attached.  You can 
still choose to read or to ignore.
Just like it's been for the last umpteen years.  It seems to me that the 
discussion of whether or not to ban [WOT]
is causing more of a disturbance than the [WOT] posts themselves.  I think 
you ought to just drop it and get on with
more PIC discussions.   All this "discussion" IMO is a waste of time and 
bandwidth.

I'm done now... Back to the regular programming.


                                                                             
                                        Jim







----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Xiaofan Chen" <xiaofanc@gmail.com>
To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public." <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Should [WOT] be allowed or not


> On Dec 7, 2007 3:26 PM, Apptech <apptech@paradise.net.nz> wrote:
>> I would think it unwise to deny as a matter of national
>> pride something which is a matter of record. I have no
>> intention or desire to criticise China overall. But some
>> things about China (in general terms) are worthy of comment
>> and some of these comment worthy things fall short of normal
>> ethical standards.
>
> If you say this, many things in a lot of countries are worthy
> of comment. Do we want to comment them here in
> PIClist? Or is it better to comment on them in other
> places?
>
> Should we comment on Iraq, Iran, North Korea,
> US, abortion, gun control, US president election,
> church, god, crime, etc? I hope not.
>
> Xiaofan
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist