> My unwanted opinion

Pour quoi?

> is that this discussion is venturing into the
> religious, hate, and political arena, and as such may be 
> more
> profitably entertained elsewhere.  :-P

Is that a reference to where the thread started out or where 
it has got to. While in this case the progression was not 
totally unpredictable, one often finds that threads mutate 
out of all recognition (as several current ones have) and 
the "fault" is often with people failing to relabel and 
retag the renegade thread.

Re Xiaofan's comment on banning [WOT]. - [WOT] does not, of 
course exist. I use it as an add on to the valid [WOT] label 
when I suspect that some few may run screaming from the room 
but think that many may be interested.

In this case, where, in the original is the explicit or even 
first order implicit religion, hate or politics? I can 
certainly see how they can be added in, but that's true of 
many subjects.

And, fwiw, most and possibly all of what I've seen others 
post on this thread seemed very largely free of religion or 
hate. And who can be rid of politics? :-).



        Russell



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist