Robert Rolf wrote: > Martin wrote: > > >> Please change the topic if you want to talk about the pros/cons of >> hybrids. We're talking about electric cars, which are quite well proven >> more efficient than gasoline cars. >> > > No, they are NOT. They only move the pollution to another location. > e.g. Coal or gas fired power plants still pollute. > > And their UNgreen cost of production (heavy metals in batteries, etc.) > probably make them LESS green than today's gasoline powered vehicles. > > You have to look at TOTAL picture to be able to say EV's are 'better' > than gasoline powered, and they are NOT! > > Kinda like the stampede to ethanol fuels. > > The TOTAL cost of producing such fuels in North America (corn based) is > MUCH more than the gasoline they save. > You have to INCLUDE the cost of fertilizer, subsidies, fuel for > cultivation and shipping and all the OTHER 'hidden' costs before you can > make a meaningful comparison. > > http://www.factsaboutethanol.org/?p=234 > > http://ca.today.reuters.com/stocks/FinanceArticle.aspx?view=PR&symbol=CM.TO&storyID=116533+22-Oct-2007+PRN > "America's efforts to add more corn-based ethanol to the nation's gas > tanks will fuel little more than inflation: CIBC World Markets > Report finds going yellow to send food prices soaring while delivering > dubious energy benefits" > > and dozens more objective reports can be found with google. > > >> Funny NYPD wrote: >> >> >>> The overall pollution of electric/hybrid cars probably is >>> > many times higher than regular vehicles. > > Key word there is 'overall'. Include EVERYTHING used in > making and running EVs vs. gas/diesel in order to draw a > meaningful conclusion. > > It's just another 'big lie' to make some people very rich. > > Robert > > While I am generally not very "green", my ultimate plan is to use cheap solar cells to charge the electric car. --Bob A -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist