Bryan Bishop wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 November 2007 05:37, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
>   
>> Do you really think Tabbed Browsing is an innovation? Personally
>> I do not use it very often.
>>     
>
> Somewhat of an innovation. The tabbed browsing idea has really 
> stagnated. Firefox implements it (plus Piro's work or the other 
> (lesser) vertical tabber extension), Opera makes it work as it is 
> supposed to,
well I should try Opera again !
>  and even dillo implements tabs, I think. But. 
>
> Tabs are far too stagnating. I can't get to all of my information. I 
> can't hierarchically sort tabs as I want,
Piro let you do it
>  I can't view them as easily 
> as I view my bookmarks.
Piro can be configured exactly like the bookmarks
>  I hear that there's a browser for Macs out 
> there called "Pathway" that makes a *graph* as you browse. That's 
> amazing, especially if it actively caches and lets you move around all 
> of the nodes and lets you navigate it as if on the command line. That 
> would be innovative. 
>   
I've tried hypergraphs, although they look very impressive,
and everyone loves them at first sight,
from my little experience they add just a fraction of the dimension to a 
organizable tree.

> But as it is, tabbed browsing, heh. Yeah. On a related note, here's my 
> FF work: http://heybryan.org/shots/June12th02007_Firefox_interface.wmv
>
>   
isn't this a ordinary tree ?

Stef
> - Bryan
>   

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist