Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> Maybe you want to consider PICkit 2 instead. I believe MPLAB 8.0
> will make PICkit 2 debugging better than now (may not catch
> ICD2, but good enough for 16F/18F). PICkit 2 is already a
> better programmer than ICD2.
>
> Read this page first:
> http://www.microchip.com/pickit2
>
> Read the following threads:
> http://forum.microchip.com/tm.aspx?m=287314
> http://forum.microchip.com/tm.aspx?m=282776
> http://forum.microchip.com/tm.aspx?m=289992

I still don't get it. "I like PK2 better, but ICD2 is better for 
debugging" -- how is ICD2 better?

"Never actually use the PK2 or ICD2 as a debugger." -- what?! Why not? I use 
ICD2 for debugging, very happy with it..

Vitaliy 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist