Wed,

This too would be a question for the support group at BasicMicro.   
I don't use PiKdev, so I can't say.   I haven't looked at the protocol
going to the programmer as I use the S/W supplied by BasicMicro.
It works very well, so I haven't had the need to look further.
In addition, since it works so well, I use the extra time to add
functionality,
change features, and/or debug the apps as appropriate.  This doesn't
give me
much time for experimentation.   However, now that you've brought it up,
I may 
take a look just for the heck of it next time I use it.   I'm not sure
exactly
when that'll be though. 



								Regards,

								  Jim



-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf
Of M Wedin
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 1:36 PM
To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
Subject: Re: [PIC]: Need suggestions for off board programmer

I don't necessarily need the software if it works with standardised
protocols. I would be overjoyed if it accepts signals produced by
PiKdev.

Wed



2007/10/31, Olin Lathrop <olin_piclist@embedinc.com>:
>
> M Wedin wrote:
> > Olin, how well supported is your programmer under Linux?
>
> It comes with Windows software only.  The protocol and host software 
> is all open and I'd be willing to help out anyone that either wants to

> port my stuff or create their own on Linux.
>
>
> ********************************************************************
> Embed Inc, Littleton Massachusetts, http://www.embedinc.com/products
> (978) 742-9014.  Gold level PIC consultants since 2000.
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your 
> membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
--
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your
membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist