Detrick Merz wrote:
> On 10/29/07, Jan-Erik Soderholm <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> wrote:
>> Detrick Merz wrote:
>>> No local processor.  Barely more than just a parallel cable.
>> OK. You will see a few supporters of that kind of
>> "programmer", and many opponents here... :-)
> 
> What's the preferred programmer hardware these days then?

Anything witrh a PIC on it... :-)
Personaly I use Wisp628.

> I know there are many factors, but being able to program many types of
> chips (at least 'F84A, 'F628A and 'F877A) is important.

Tip, check the 17F88x line instead. E.g. 16F887 is a better
PIC then the 877A at aproxc half the price...

Jan-Erik.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist