Matt Pobursky wrote:
> I don't think you can get the Windows IDE/Debugger with anything but PCWH.
> You can always use the PCB, PCM or in your case PCH (PIC18) command line
> compiler and debug with MPLAB. CCS does have a compiler plugin for MPLAB.

Matt, you think C18 is *better* than CCS? Aside from ANSI compliance (which 
C18 is really not, 100%), what makes it better? From own experience, and a 
recent thread (which I quoted in the OP), it sounds like C18 is actually 
pretty dumb.

> If I were going down this road then I would probably use Microchip's C18 
> or
> Hitech's PICC as they are slightly better compilers (ANSI compliant for
> instance). For me the real value in the CCS tools is the source level
> debugging of PCWH.

What if cost was not a big consideration, would you choose PCWH? And which 
part of PCWH's source level debugging do you value the most? 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist