On 10/16/07, wouter van ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> wrote:

> > http://www.quantum-leaps.com/
> >
> > That is why I think dual license is a good idea but I highly doubt it
> > will happen. To allow dual license, one needs to have a firm control
> > of the copyright but Linux kernel has too many copyright holders.
>
> IMHO a problem of dual-licensing is that it places one party in a
> special position, so it does not invite third parties to contribute new
> stuff, which is the strength of real free licenses (both GPL and BSD
> interpretation of 'free').
>

This may be true. But I think they are success stories like QT
and MySQL.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist