Michael Rigby-Jones wrote:
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] 
>> On Behalf Of Jan-Erik Soderholm
>> Sent: 16 October 2007 13:50
>> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
>> Subject: Re: [PIC] movff ignores banksel, correct?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> and since the access bank is not being used here,...
>> I think it is.
>> To use the BSR, the machine inst for ADDWF "2400" would have 
>> been "2500". The difference is the "a" bit. a = "0" => access bank.
>> And the "MOVWF   _SSPBUF" also uses the access bank, so it weird...
> 
> Oops, you are absolutely correct, I was thinking the access bit worked the other way around.  On closer inspection the address of all registers is zero, so I guess this assembly listing is probably directly from the compiler, before the link stage so no addresses have been resolved.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mike

Right, and the question is id the linker does anything with the
"a" bit also... :-)

Jan-Erik.
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist