On 10/15/07, wouter van ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> wrote:
> > What other options are out there?
>
> >From the viewpoint of an open source author I've been struggling to
> write my own license, but I was never realy satisfied with the result
> (http://www.voti.nl/efl). Check freertos and ecos: they are basically
> GPL but allow a closed source application.
>

I think the FreeRTOS model is good since it provides paid (non-free)
alternatives called OpenRTOS. This is similar to QT.
http://www.freertos.org/a00114.html

I think the eCOS license is good but it is still linked to GPL. Not so sure
about the implications as I am not a lawyer.
http://cygwin.com/ml/ecos-maintainers/2005-07/msg00004.html

Xiaofan
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist