--- Russell McMahon <apptech@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

> >> > Seeing as this is PIC-based it should be PIC
> tagged, not [OT]
> >>
> >> Seeing this is processor irrelevant but deeply
> [EE] relevant it 
> >> should
> >> be EE tagged :-).
> >
> > No - the real thing is based on a PIC
> 
> Still processor irrelevant.
> And they say they are changing to AVR.
> It's coded in C with the PIC there mainly AFAICS
> because they had a 
> board that used one.
> Whatever ... :-)
> 
>         Russell 
> 
> -- 
  I just have to ASK this question. Besides being
faster *AVR* why not just stick to PIC? Looks
perfectly fine for the application. Are they doing
some DSP on board???


John


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos & more. 
http://mobile.yahoo.com/go?refer=1GNXIC
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist