> Firstly I seldom use piclist.com.
> 
> I was trying to use the PIClist.com archive to refer to the 
> old top-posting thread but unfortuantely it is very ugly with 
> so many Google ads. I have to use Nabble.com which I do not 
> quite like as well but at least it is usable.
> 
> I understand the situation and bandwidth costs money and it 
> is a good resource. So Google ads is fine. But IMHO, there 
> should be a limit.
> 
> Just compare these two.
> 
>
http://www.nabble.com/-EE--Top-posting%2C-is-it-really-that-bad--tf615396.ht
ml#a1674849
> 
>
http://www.piclist.com/techref/postbot.asp?by=time&id=piclist\2005\11\25\102
528.txt

Errr... Do you seriously find that one little box with two google ads in it
objectionable? Perhaps we are not seeing the same things. Here is what I see
on nabble:

http://www.massmind.org/images/delmenabble.png

And here is what I see on piclist:

http://www.massmind.org/images/delmepiclist.png

---
James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com  1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist