Dario Greggio wrote: > Neil Cherry wrote: > >>> With RS485 CAT.5 wire, I have no problems :) >> That fixes Layer 1 and what of Layer 2? :-) > > Checksum, Collision Detect ... addressing... > I developed my protocol: nothing better or worse than existing, but, you > know, pleasure in creating it! (and wrapping it into C++ Classes for > MSVC, and more) The layer 2 portion is always a bit harder ;-). But I agree it's not a terrible burden. And I definitely understand the pleasure in creating something of your own. My wife thinks I'm nuts when I've created something new. She pretty much shoots down my joy when I do something complex and make it simple. She views things as 'all you have to do' not realizing that it takes hours of work, a certain level of intelligence and imagination and a lot of perseverance. >> You are not impressed by the analog technology used in the late >> 1970's? Boy are you spoiled! ;-) For the time the design is very >> cool, of course all this can be pretty easily handled with a PIC >> (but now we could also throw in ACKs). Take a look at this if your >> curious: > > Talking to me? :) > Yes, I said they work pretty well having in mind the way, times, and > scope they were made for. My apologies for my witless sarcasm, it is my attempt at humor. I've always been very impressed by the hardware. Very simple, except for the analog shift chip use in the earlier product. Today they use the PIC1657 (?) in a lot of their products. I wish they had chosen the 1684 as then they would have solved some problems with interrupts. Of course a simple ACK today would fix half of the problems with X10. Of course X10 doesn't seem to be interested in investing anymore time and money in the basic X10 product. -- Linux Home Automation Neil Cherry ncherry@linuxha.com http://www.linuxha.com/ Main site http://linuxha.blogspot.com/ My HA Blog Author of: Linux Smart Homes For Dummies -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist