On 5 Aug 2007 at 15:24, Jinx wrote:

> At last, a legal resolution

That's good to hear. Most NZ NDA's that I've been presented with are the 
most waffly bits of rubbish out there.

> The NDA has been declared worthless, because I did not learn
> anything new about the product from the client.

Who made the ruling ?
Is your client bound by / agree / know about it ?

Steve.











 If you remember
> 
> "- I'd already independently invented and built one for myself 10
> years ago (but never went ahead and commercialised it), so I'm not
> ignorant of its existence. Neither are all the people who knew about
> mine before this client came along"
> 
> In fact the exchange of information was only from me to the client
> 
> If you follow this logically, and I think a couple of people mentioned
> this, it is not acceptable for an NDA to be used (sneakily or other-
> wise) for the purposes of restraint-of-trade
> 
> So when I get some free time and $$$ I'll marketing it myself
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist