SETF :-)

> 
> 
> Hm, let's see, my MOVLF h'00', is a CLRF,
> but what am I missing about the MOVLF h'FF' ?
> 
> A COMF doesn't work, if it's not h'00' before.
> The same with INCF, DECF. What else ?
> 
> Jan-Erik.
> 
> Mark Scoville wrote:
> > Yup, also a MOVLF h'FF' instruction :-)
> > 
> > -- Mark
> > 
> >>
> >> Well, at least there is a "MOVLF h'00'" instruction... :-)
> >> But for other values, no.
> >>
> >> Jan-Erik.
> >>
> >> Dario Greggio wrote:
> >>> Matthew Rhys-Roberts wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I know it's hardly a problem to load the literal into W first, 
> >> then move 
> >>>> W into the desired file, but why would they fail to design 
> >> such a useful 
> >>>> one-step function?
> >>> a matter of RISC architecture... I guess :)
> >>> MOVFF (file to file) came out in 18F parts, was not there on 
> >> earlier ones.
> >>> You can write a macro for MOVLF: the rationale is that such a 
> >> macro will 
> >>> still, probably, be faster than a MOVLF-like instruction on a 
> >> 80x86 CPU...
> >>>
> >> -- 
> >> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> >> View/change your membership options at
> >> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist