Hm, let's see, my MOVLF h'00', is a CLRF,
but what am I missing about the MOVLF h'FF' ?

A COMF doesn't work, if it's not h'00' before.
The same with INCF, DECF. What else ?

Jan-Erik.

Mark Scoville wrote:
> Yup, also a MOVLF h'FF' instruction :-)
> 
> -- Mark
> 
>>
>> Well, at least there is a "MOVLF h'00'" instruction... :-)
>> But for other values, no.
>>
>> Jan-Erik.
>>
>> Dario Greggio wrote:
>>> Matthew Rhys-Roberts wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know it's hardly a problem to load the literal into W first, 
>> then move 
>>>> W into the desired file, but why would they fail to design 
>> such a useful 
>>>> one-step function?
>>> a matter of RISC architecture... I guess :)
>>> MOVFF (file to file) came out in 18F parts, was not there on 
>> earlier ones.
>>> You can write a macro for MOVLF: the rationale is that such a 
>> macro will 
>>> still, probably, be faster than a MOVLF-like instruction on a 
>> 80x86 CPU...
>>>
>> -- 
>> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
>> View/change your membership options at
>> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>>
>>
> 
> 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist