Yup, also a MOVLF h'FF' instruction :-)

-- Mark

> 
> 
> Well, at least there is a "MOVLF h'00'" instruction... :-)
> But for other values, no.
> 
> Jan-Erik.
> 
> Dario Greggio wrote:
> > Matthew Rhys-Roberts wrote:
> > 
> >> I know it's hardly a problem to load the literal into W first, 
> then move 
> >> W into the desired file, but why would they fail to design 
> such a useful 
> >> one-step function?
> > 
> > a matter of RISC architecture... I guess :)
> > MOVFF (file to file) came out in 18F parts, was not there on 
> earlier ones.
> > 
> > You can write a macro for MOVLF: the rationale is that such a 
> macro will 
> > still, probably, be faster than a MOVLF-like instruction on a 
> 80x86 CPU...
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist