Well, at least there is a "MOVLF h'00'" instruction... :-)
But for other values, no.

Jan-Erik.

Dario Greggio wrote:
> Matthew Rhys-Roberts wrote:
> 
>> I know it's hardly a problem to load the literal into W first, then move 
>> W into the desired file, but why would they fail to design such a useful 
>> one-step function?
> 
> a matter of RISC architecture... I guess :)
> MOVFF (file to file) came out in 18F parts, was not there on earlier ones.
> 
> You can write a macro for MOVLF: the rationale is that such a macro will 
> still, probably, be faster than a MOVLF-like instruction on a 80x86 CPU...
> 
> 
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist