On Jun 25, 2007, at 7:17 AM, Russell McMahon wrote:

> JPG 85 setting achieved a file 25% of the size of the original

Do you find that 3rd party SW will create smaller JPGs even at
"full" resolution?  I've seen some hints that this might be the
case, but haven't tracked it down and don't know if JPG is one of
those protocols where you can get higher compression at the same
"loss" level by throwing more CPU cycles at it...

BillW

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist