Keeping track of the decimal point is pretty much a lost art in my experience. I've a 5-inch rule in my pocket, a frequent occasion for eye-rolling among my younger colleagues :) Still works, though... ---- wouter van ooijen wrote: > Today I had three students 1st y systeembeheer (== system maintainer?) > do some calculations. One was an estimate of the time needed for a > typical windows system cal. Their answer was 0.2 seconds, and that did > not seem strange to them at all. > > I helped them a little, and they had to divide 20 seconds by 20000. Two > refused to give an answer (but I need my calculator for that!), the > third answered: 0.00002 seconds . I am not sure whether I weas more > disappointed by the first two boys, or the amount of zeros, or by the > final 2. > > Next we had (or rather: I gave them) the answer: 0.001 seconds. Now I > asked: how do you prounce that. They had a vague idea that milliseconds > and microseconds are both small, but could not say which was smaller, or > which was 0.001. > > According to my fellow teachers these boys are not bad, they are > typical. I hope for the safety of my country that serious engineering > work is very quickly outsourced to countries where 18y boys still have > at least some feeling for numbers and values... > > Wouter van Ooijen > > -- ------------------------------------------- > Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl > consultancy, development, PICmicro products > docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu > > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist