Hector Martin-2 wrote:
> 
> M Wedin wrote:
>> I have come across the strangest problem. When I compile a standalone
>> run.asm:91:Error [152] Executable code and data must be defined in an
>> appropriate section.
>> 
>> And lots of them. The simplest bsf instruction will cause one to occur.
>> 
>> I would be very happy if someone could shed some light on this. I am
>> using
>> PiKdev under Debian Etch, stable.
>> Best regards, Wed
> Pikdev wants you to use relocatable mode for everything, whereas your 
> source is probably using absolute mode. Check for "ORG" directives 
> (relocatable mode uses "CODE" instead).
> 
> Pikdev is a project-based system and allows for multiple source files, 
> so it forces you to use relocatable mode (at least by default). 
> Relocatable is better anyway, as it's much more flexible.
> 
> There has been a lot written on the subject. See this link for example:
> http://forum.microchip.com/tm.aspx?m=46653&mpage=1
> 
> By the way, I use Piklab. It's a fork of Pikdev, and in my opinion it's 
> much better :) (at least back when I switched)
> 
> -- 
> Hector Martin (hector@marcansoft.com)
> Public Key: http://www.marcansoft.com/marcan.asc
> 
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 
> 

Thanks a whole lot, works great. It makes sense really ... But it had me
steaming for a while. I can't recall it doing this before.

I checked out Piklab and it seems interesting. Is Alain Gibaud on board this
fork? Oh well, I'll find out. But I really appreciate his effort.

Wed
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Executable-code-and-appropriate-section.-tf3780855.html#a10698196
Sent from the MicroControllers - PIC mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist