> > Once again Russell is the voice that I find compelling He 
> manages to 
> > avoid making Global Warming into a religion.
> > Or labeling folks as pro or anti-GW.
> > Science is not about politics or positions.... it is about 
> exploring.
> > See the life of Richard Feynman as an example.
> >
> > I am afraid we may soon see the president announcing a WOGW. *
> >
> > Cedric
> >
> >
> > *war on global warming


Before this becomes a religious issue (and by that, I mean one that can't be
proven one way or the other) I would like to call for avoiding all the
possible political responses to that comment. I'm biting my tongue (HARD)
and I would very much appreciate it if everyone else would do the same. 

Oh.... And it is SO, SO hard to do isn't it?

Secondly, no matter if Global Warming is real or not real or maybe real or
what the heck ever, doesn't it makes sense to try as much as we can to have
a small impact on the earth? 

Given that we are very dependant on the old girl, wouldn't it be wise to
UNDER estimate how much of a load she can compensate for?

Even if there is no global warming, shouldn't we spend a few cycles thinking
about how to have a small footprint on the earth?

---
James.
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist