> Once again Russell is the voice that I find compelling > He manages to avoid making Global Warming into a religion. > Or labeling folks as pro or anti-GW. > Science is not about politics or positions.... it is about exploring. > See the life of Richard Feynman as an example. > > I am afraid we may soon see the president announcing a WOGW. * > > Cedric > > > *war on global warming > > > On May 18, 2007, at 7:13 AM, Mike Hord wrote: > >> Superb New Scientist special guide debunking the top 26 'anti global >> warming' myths. >> >> snip snip >> >> With all this good science in support, how can anyone possibly >> question its reality? >> >> snip snip >> >> "Most of the observed increase in globally averaged >> temperatures since the >> mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase >> in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations > > Surprisingly Russell (given his love of all things exo-atmospheric) > left > off one pointed comment (of which I am certain he is aware): > > Planetary studies of Titan, Venus, and Mars have fairly conclusively > proven the veracity of the effect of greenhouse gases in raising > planetary surface temperatures above where orbital insolation > suggests they should be, and large amounts of suspended > particulates in the atmosphere tend to increase albedo causing a > drop in planetary surface temperatures. > > So, in short, the reason we haven't seen runaway temperature > increases may not be because the effect isn't real, it may be that > the ash and particulates produced by coal and diesel and other > less-than-optimally-clean greenhouse gas producing energy > generation methods is offsetting the effect of the gases. > > Mike H. > > who has been reading a lot of space science books lately. > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist