Rich Satterlee wrote:

>>> I agree the signal on the servo is PWM, but the FM transmitted is PPM
>>> coded - but this signal is not the one you care about when you use the
>>> one already decoded by the receiver.
>> 
>> I'm not sure I understand the distinction between PWM and PPM you guys
>> are making here.

> I think that if you consider the "envelope" of Pulse Position Encoding
> with each of the channels being Pulse Width Modulation (one PWM per
> channel), then you might have a clearer idea of what they are talking
> about.

Yes, thanks, makes sense... Yet, I wouldn't call this PPM -- if this is to
mean Pulse Position /Modulation/. You're using a term ("Encoding") that
makes more sense.

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist