I built half of a controller already with an ISOTOP MOSFET and schottky. It's rated for a maximum of around 200 amps so I think I'll keep it around 100A peak. I built a PWM circuit from a 555 to try it out, but I think I had some spikes kill the 555 already.. I haven't gotten to my AVR circuit yet ;-) The starting resistor is a good idea. I am planning on hooking it up with a contactor controller before getting the semiconductor controller hooked up. -- Martin K On 4/23/07, James Newtons Massmind wrote: > > > Very nice work!. Imho look into a starting resistor before > > you build a controller. You could ruin the motor without it. > > A starting resistor will limit the torque at start. Take the > > wire element from a 500W space heater and fold it in half 5 > > times. Twist the resulting bundle and put it in series with > > your existing cabling, with a second switch to short it. This > > will limit start current to about 30 Amps (about 1Hp). If the > > start is still to brutal cut wires from the strand and keep > > trying. Eventually the wires will glow (ignore that but mind > > anything that may catch fire from it). Normally the throttle > > is arranged to make the main switch and as you push it > > further make the start resistor shorting switch. I am sure > > that you can make such a thing by bending the contacts on a > > contactor a little and then using it manually (footably? ) > > as a foot switch. > > > > Peter P. > > I remember seeing a very nice power control that rewired a set of small > batteries (I think they were 6 volt Motor Cycle types) in different series > and parallel combinations to provide from 6 to 48 volts over a series of > steps. E.g. the first one was all the batteries in parallel so the result > was 6volts at high amperage for starting out, then in parallel sets of 2 in > series for 12 volts, and so on until all the batteries were in series for > the maximum voltage. The advantage, so I remember reading, was that startup > was smoother and a smaller starting resistor could be used. > > The mechanical design looked like a ships engine speed indicator system but > with a set of knife switches built into it instead of the dial. It was break > before make and there were detents so that it jerked from one position to > the next in discrete steps. > > Building that might be an interesting project on its own, although you have > to wonder if an electronic controller might actually be simpler... > > --- > James. > > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- Martin Klingensmith -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist