> I think 16F887 can be a real replacement for the 16F877A. 

depends on the context. if existing www support (project pages) is a
requirement the 16F84, 16F628 and 16F877 (in that order) are probably
still the favourites. OTOH if the OP was looking for a PIC on pure
technical grounds probably none of those would be on it. That's why I
aswked for context...

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist