>From Arocket - and my comment

>>   Another photo by the same photographer at:
>>     http://www.airsceneuk.org.uk/airshow05/riat05/parttwo/10.htm

>>   and yet another from a different photographer:
>>     http://www.airteamimages.com/15241.html
>
> I might believe one photo is faked.
>
> I might believe that two photos from the same guy might be faked.
>
> Looks to me like it was real...


Again. The event was unquestionably real.
The question is whether the stopped prop, transparent poles, 
interesting shadows ghostless image is as photographed or a composite.

The above two images lend credence to the idea that the original is a 
clever "fake".
All the questionable features in the original are not present in these 
images.
Of especial note is the propellor image as it is in these two much as 
would be expected and utterly different to the original which was 
beautifully and totally stopped. Also, in these two examples, the 
blurring from panning and pole images and transparency and more is 
much more as would be expected.

These are great shots, but they do not come close technically to the 
original.



        Russell





-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist