Russell McMahon wrote:

> Interestingly, in this case I have not noticed anyone trying to defend
> Microsoft's indefensible practices in this area - not even the apologist
> who for some reason seems to delight in rubbishing other people but
> defending every aspect of Microsoft's endeavours. Maybe on this matter
> we have finally reached agreement.

Not sure, but in any case I don't think this has been discussed.

> FWIW, for various reasons I still use OE (but never O) myself and am 
> in most areas happy enough with the capabilities and results, but as 
> it has problems with active mail stores over about 4 GB (or maybe it's 
> the 130,000 odd messages)  [ :-) ] that too may change.

FWIW, Outlook is not primarily an email program. It is foremost an Exchange
client, secondly a PIM, and it can do normal email, too. Looking at it as a
dedicated email client is usually missing the point.

Gerhard

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist