David VanHorn wrote:
>> > instead of the convoluted (and slower)
>> >
>> > i &= ~(1<<6)
>> If its slower (at runtime) than your compiler sucks! constant expressions
>> shuold be completely evaluated at compile time.
>
>
> I was wondering about that..
> Somebody please tell me there isn't a compiler out there that would do 
> that
> as six shifts???

Jeez... don't you guys have anything better to do, besides counting my bits 
and discovering errors in my logic? ;-D

Vitaliy

PS Peter -- it's "it's", not "its", and "then", not "than". ;) 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist