And basic is just plain old fashioned. It had its day but the ZX81 is a
museum piece now and that was faster if you bypassed the interpreter ....

Steve

-----Original Message-----
From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of
James Newton, Host
Sent: 11 March 2007 04:43
To: 'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'
Subject: RE: [PIC] BASIC Compilers

Please change the subject. The PIC vs Assembly thread is dead.

---
James Newton: PICList webmaster/Admin
mailto:jamesnewton@piclist.com  1-619-652-0593 phone
http://www.piclist.com/member/JMN-EFP-786
PIC/PICList FAQ: http://www.piclist.com


 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu 
> [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu] On Behalf Of Tony Antoniou
> Sent: 2007 Mar 10, Sat 18:40
> To: 'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'
> Subject: RE: [PIC] Why bother with Assembly?
> 
> Question, while we're sort of on the topic ...
> 
> As I've stated before, I'm looking into PicBASIC and from 
> what I've seen, the only useful one seems to be the expensive 
> Proton Plus compiler. Are there any other recommendations on 
> the BASIC platform (as well as C - I might experiment with 
> that one too)?
> 
> 
> Adios,
> Tony
> 
> ---------------  TAMA - The Strongest Name in Drums  ---------------
> --
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change 
> your membership options at 
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist