Thank you Mike ! On 2/22/07, Mike Harrison wrote: > On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 08:09:58 -0800, you wrote: > > >Hello, > > > >There is any user of Tektronix DPO4104 oscilloscope on the list ? > >I'm planning in the near future to buy this scope. I saw the > >comparison presented on the Tektronix site between this scope and > >Agilent DSO6000 series or LeCroy. > >I've worked with both LeCroy and Agilent but I didn't touch this scope > >series from Tektronix. I would really like to hear some users > >opinions, other than manufacturer. > > As a user of an Agilent MSO6034 I think Tek would have a tough job making something that was nicer > to use. I've not used any of the very recent Teks but those I have used have had a much clunkier > user interface ( e.g. one set of Y controls & you have to select the channel) and much less > acquisition memory. You NEED deep memory. > Note that Agilent have added some neat features to the 6000 in recent software updates, like full > web access & control (e.g. do printouts from any PC on the network), bus display of digital inputs > an a host of extra trigger modes like Nth-pulse-in-burst. > If you're spending this sort of money on a scope, you should get some serious hands-on time on all > the possibles to use for your own applications as everyone has different needs & preferences - I > think most manufacturers will loan units for a week or 2 - Agilent certainly do. > > Re. LeCroy - do you really want a scope that contains a hard disk and runs Windows..? > Thought not. > > Also worth looking at Yokogawa - I've only had a very brief look but they have some > interesting-looking products, including AFAIK the only one other than Agilent that does > mixed-signal. > http://www.yokogawa.com/tm/dl/tm-dl.htm > > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist