Ok then I'll try to do as you all sugested..

regards....

"William Chops Westfield" <westfw@mac.com> wrote in message 
news:ad0f23ca48339df1a7ec9e78e028a40e@mac.com...
>
> On Feb 10, 2007, at 1:33 AM, Vitaliy wrote:
>
>> Trust me, forget the handshaking lines. You're making
>> your life harder than it should be. :)
>
> Despite my long comments on how to do half-duplex better, I agree
> entirely with Vitaliy here.  Half-duplex is complex and obnoxious,
> and only to be used where it is REQUIRED by some piece of legacy
> equipment or obscure topology.  What you've described should be
> easy to do with only rx/tx for data.  In the worst case, you might
> want to look at "software flow control", like HP's old ENQ/ACK
> protocol.  But you shouldn't need active manipulation of RTS/CTS/etc
>
> BillW
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
> 



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist