Hi Russell,

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:56:21AM +1300, Russell McMahon wrote:

> I think that's not doing James' attempt at justification of his stance 
> (which of course he doesn't have to justify as within this context he 
> is 'god') any favours :-) Lets' see if the logic works as I think it 
> does ...

I'm sorry that you read so much into my post. I was only replying to that
small part of Vitality's post, and I've not read any of the prior posts that
started this thread.

Take care.        Matthew

-- 
"Any proposition advanced without evidence can be dismissed without
evidence." -- Sam Harris
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist