On 1/27/07, Vitaliy wrote: > James Newtons Massmind wrote: > > As a list owner, I get to set the rules and define the words. > > Yes, this is what it boils down to. So we have to agree that there is no democracy process here even though the following rules set by Jame the God of the PIClist is very ambiguous. I believe the rules are set in such a way so that he can explain it in his favor. > > The forbidden > > here is discussion of what can not be known. Things that will not reveal > > themselves to confirmable tests and studies. It is very hard to define "can not be known". That is very subjective. To a free thinker like me, any supernature things are non-existent and it is "known" to me. To one firmly belive in certain religion, the God they believe is known to them. > > However, I also think that sometimes you are being inconsistent in your > application of the rules, and I reserve the right to voice my opinion > regarding this subject, as well as others, including (but not limited to) > polyamory, homosexuality, poligamy, and mahogany. What you do with that > opinion is up to you. > The truth is that James is a human being and a human being can not be always consistent. So the best approach is to ignore those topics and let people indulged in the [WOT] topics continue their topics. Sometime they do become interesting even though one may not agree with what they say. -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist