To me it proves my theory that the photon travels back and forth through time and passes the scanned object more than once in the moment that it establishes this 'standing wave'... On 1/22/07, Alex Harford wrote: > > On 1/22/07, Michael Rigby-Jones wrote: > > > > >Sounds like a relative of the two-slit experiment, in some ways. > > > > Would you not need more than one photon to create interference? > > No, because it's acting as a wave in this case. > > Alex > -- > http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive > View/change your membership options at > http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist > -- ----- Tobias Gogolin cel. (646) 124 32 82 skype: moontogo messenger: usertogo@hotmail.com -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist