In SX Microcontrollers, SX/B Compiler and SX-Key Tool, Sparks-R-Fun wrote: [b]RobotWorkshop:[/b] The board looks nice. Good job! I know you like the kit idea, but I think there is probably an interest in an assembled and tested version as well. I understand you said it has an on board 800ma regulator. Nice. Where is that, on the underside of the board? [b]Günther:[/b] My personal interest in a "straight-through" adapter for the SX48 would be for a 48-pin DIL-shaped carrier. I could also go for something long the lines of what DaveG was describing, though for me it would need to be priced very near to the current SX48 proto-board price. That is hard to beat! The key desirable feature, as I see it, is the ability to drop it straight into a breadboard. Also, it seems to me that for a DIL arrangement vs. a square the real estate layout would change but the total circuit board area would not significantly increase. Here are some quick calculations I did. [b]Square Arrangement:[/b] (48 pins) / (4 sides) = 12 Pins/Side (12 Pins/Side) * (0.1" Spacing/Pin) = 1.2"/Side Call it about 1.5"/Side as you have done to allow 0.3" for circuit board edges. (0.3" might be a bit much.) Circuit board area is then approximately (1.5") * (1.5") = (2.25 "^2) [b]DIL Arrangement:[/b] (48 pins) / (2 Rows) = 24 Pins/Row (24 Pins/Row) * (0.1" Spacing/Pin) = 2.4"/Row Assume the rows are spaced 0.4" apart along the short side. Now add 0.3" for circuit board edges around each side as was done for the square arrangement. (2.4"/Row) + 0.3" additional = 2.7"/Row 0.4" + 0.3" = 0.7" along the short side. Circuit board area is then approximately (2.7") * (0.7") = (1.89 "^2) I may have overlooked something, but it seem to me that a DIL arrangement would actually require less real estate area than a square arrangement. Just thinking... - Sparks ---------- End of Message ---------- You can view the post on-line at: http://forums.parallax.com/forums/default.aspx?f=7&p=1&m=166781#m166927 Need assistance? Send an email to the Forum Administrator at forumadmin@parallax.com The Parallax Forums are powered by dotNetBB Forums, copyright 2002-2007 (http://www.dotNetBB.com)