Could probably just shorten that to the first sentence and it would be adequate - would ensure that any lawsuit by somebody doing something stupid failed. Unfortunately I'm guessing it would also be deemed to be an unfair contract term! On 1/12/07, William Couture wrote: > > I prefer the "generic" warning: > > - This product is not for use by stupid people. If you find a way to > abuse this > product and hurt yourself in a way that nobody has though of before, we > cannot be held responsible. > > Bill > > -- http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive View/change your membership options at http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist