Herbert Graf wrote:
>
>
> The fact though is your programmer is meant for completely different
> purposes then the ICD2 IMHO. The ICD2 is really optimized for in circuit
> debugging. As such, it has alot of limitations if you want to use it as
> a standalone programmer, which makes sense since that's not it's primary
> purpose.
>
> Personally, I don't feel comparing the ICD2 to your programmer (or other
> standalone programmers) is very fair to either side. They are really
> apples and oranges. Anyone with an ICD2 should IMHO have a dedicated
> standalone programmer (either your programmer or any of the others). The
> limitations the ICD2 has when standalone programming really do get in
> the way sometimes.
>
>   
Well said. I like the ICD2 clone, but there are MANY difficulties in 
using  the ICD2 for
programming-only duties.

--Bob
>   

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist