> And where are the other 80+ tapes of the Pentagon strike that the
> FBI confiscated within minutes of the crash ?

I saw a program the other night called "911 : In Plane Site : The
Director's Cut", made by David vonKleist

The official explanation that an airliner hit the Pentagon looked
pretty unbelievable based on that program's evidence. I'd seen
other "conspiracy theory" films about it, but this one really went
into it in depth. In short -

- the Pentagon is bristling with surveillance cameras, inside and out,
as you'd expect. Release of any of that footage would clear the
matter up once and for all. As it isn't being releasing then.....why ?

- the "footage" from across the road shows no plane. In fact it
shows nothing clearly

- the outer walls pictured after the crash but before the collapse
show absolutely no damage from wings, engines or tail. Wreckage
of any size (eg two humping great airliner engines) is neither in nor
out of the building. (in another film, teams of people are seen
scouring and cleaning the lawn immediately after the crash, and
wrapped debris is shown being trucked away)

- the fuel load of the "plane" would have been comparable to that
of the two which hit the WTC, with enormous BTU, yet there is
significantly less fire damage. Offices exposed to the hole are
barely singed, and even paperwork is still on desks

- compare this with Flight 175 hitting the South Tower. Both the
physical and fire damage are significantly less

- whatever it was punched a fairly clean hole through, altogether,
(from memory) 9 metres of steel-reinforced concrete to penetrate
the inner rings of the building. That's 30ft

The program makes the assertion that if one part of the entire
four-plane incident is suspect, then is it reasonable to assume
that the rest of it is. A suggestion was that The War Machine,
which includes major contractors, needed a new boogieman to
stay in business. Saddam will do, and he's got oil

The film presented a de-classified document which showed that
at one time a plan was drawn up to fabricate an attack by Cuba
to justify an invasion and remove Castro. This plan included attacks
on US ships and personnel by covert US forces

And it's widely believed that Pearl Harbour was no surprise. ISTR
Churchill (who was not Japanese Prime Minister, he was actually
on the Allies side) at least was well aware of Japanese troop
movements and what they were planning

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist