> -----Original Message-----
> From: piclist-bounces@mit.edu [mailto:piclist-bounces@mit.edu]On Behalf
> Of alan smith
> Sent: 08 December 2006 21:48
> To: Microcontroller discussion list - Public.
> Subject: RE: [PIC] movwf vs movff
> 
> 
> OK...forgot about the access bit, but it should have worked since 
> the reg value is located at 0x46 register space.  Now, if I set 
> the access bit to 1, it works.  But....if I move the register to 
> the beginning of the space..ie....0x20, it works with no access 
> bit set.  It caught me off guard since it had been working but 
> then I added in some additional registers inbetween so it pushed 
> it further down the register space.  So if ignoring BSR allows 
> you to register the first 128 bytes....and I had it located at 
> 0x46  (dec 71) then it should have worked in anycase?
i thought so too,

which pic are you targetting (i'm assuming its an 18 series because you mention movff)? i belive the access bank arrangements may vary a bit.

also you aren't running the processor in extended mode are you (if its a second gen 18 series)


-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist