> Water *ON* Mars now (albeit not for long).
>
> NASA new conference called for 1pm EST December 6th.
>
>        http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.nl.html?pid=21406
>


It's a definite maybe !!!

    http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn10740

Now you don't, now you see it

        http://space.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn10740/dn10740-1_627.jpg

The gully is encouraging.

Here is a recent "something flow" but it could have been liquid CO2 or 
even dust or sand. Or water. Juries out.

    http://space.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn10740/dn10740-3_318.jpg

Once they get around to sending people we won't have the sort of 
equivocal results that unmanned missions invariably provide. (We'll 
instead have the sort of equivocal results that manned missions 
provide)(A much higher class of equivocation however).

____________

This baby, however, also on Mars, is brand new.
Don't stand underneath things that do this:

        http://space.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn10740/dn10740-2_337.jpg
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist