And where are the other 80+ tapes of the Pentagon strike that the FBI
confiscated within minutes of the crash?
And in the one they do release, why can you see objects behind the object
thats supposedly a 757. Objects
that like trees that are shorter than a 44 ft tall 757? Add the upward
looking angle fro the camera (it's only 3 feet off
the ground) and the blocking effect of the plane on background objects
should be amplified.

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/pentagon.swf

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jinx
  To: "Microcontroller discussion list - Public."
  Subject: Re: [OT] Physics denies official 9/11 report.
  Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 22:14:59 +1300


  > and the damage of the Pentagon is not the information/evidence
  > that exists, it's what doesn't exist that's interesting

  I thought interesting the claim by the US Government that, in order
  to quell suspicion about the Pentagon incident, they released "more
  footage which clearly shows a plane". Which it doesn't. It is no
  more enlightening than the original few stills released. Whether a
  plane did or didn't exist, to quote Judge Judy, "don't piss on my
  shoes and tell me it's raining"

  --
  http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
  View/change your membership options at
  http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

-- 

Search for products and services at: 
http://search.mail.com

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist