--===============1077285866==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by pch.mit.edu id kB59Gdo6030921

James Newtons Massmind wrote:

> http://www.projectcensored.org/censored_2007/index.htm#17

While looking around on the projectcensored.org site, I found something
else.


> But the 9/11 "attack" did move the nation to support the invasion of Ir=
aq by
> the USA,=20

Not only that. It also did move the nation to support the invasion of
Afghanistan. Yet:

On <http://www.projectcensored.org/updatedrealnews/index.htm>:

------------------------
No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11
Researched by Morgan Ulery

Osama bin Ladin=A1=A6s role in the events of September 11, 2001 is not me=
ntioned
on the FBI=A1=A6s =A1=A7Ten Most Wanted=A1=A8 notice. Go to:
<http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/fugitives/fugitives.htm>. Five years
later Rex Tomb, chief of investigative publicity for the FBI explains,
=A1=A7The reason 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden's Most Wanted p=
age is
because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11=A1K He =
has
not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because th=
e
FBI has no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11.=A1=A8 Among many
questions, author Ed Haas starts with, =A1=A7If the U.S. government does =
not
have enough hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11, how is it possibl=
e
that it had enough evidence to invade Afghanistan?=A1=A8 =A1=A7FBI says, =
=A1=A5No hard
evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11=A1=A8 Paul V. Sheridan and Ed Haas,=
 The
Ithica Journal, 6/29/2006
<http://www.theithacajournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=3D/20060629/OP=
INION02/606290310/1014>
------------------------

The link to the article in The Ithaca Journal doesn't work. Searching for
it at the journal's site with the names of the authors does work and brin=
gs
up the article, but accessing its full text is not free.=20

(So far it's been all fact, now comes the doubt... :)

But that article is not really necessary. The FBI Ten Most Wanted link do=
es
work. I find it strange that the evidence is not considered strong enough
to list the participation on a government web site, but it was considered
strong enough to send the military into a foreign country and conduct a m=
an
hunt. Really strange. Shouldn't there be a higher standard required by a
military action of that extent (or any extent) than by a web site content=
?=20

Gerhard


--===============1077285866==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist

--===============1077285866==--