> and the damage of the Pentagon is not the information/evidence
> that exists, it's what doesn't exist that's interesting

I thought interesting the claim by the US Government that, in order
to quell suspicion about the Pentagon incident, they released "more
footage which clearly shows a plane". Which it doesn't. It is no
more enlightening than the original few stills released. Whether a
plane did or didn't exist, to quote Judge Judy, "don't piss on my
shoes and tell me it's raining"

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist