> >> (Of course there are other criteria: command line 
> operation, features
> >> like overlaying serial numbers over the hex file etc.)
> > 
> > no, those are not relevant to the prototype-development 
> distinction as
> > uChip defines these terms.
> 
> Yes, but I used a more "real-life" distinction, as the Microchip
> distinction seems to be not very useful anyway in the light 
> of what they
> say about their Flash technology.

But when you make your own distinction what's the relevance? (seriously)
Most people seem to prefer a windows interface, but I prefer a command
line. So which of the two is more prototype and which is more
development?

For your own distinctions you should use a different set of words, maybe
indeed the dreaded 'professional' versus 'hobbyist'.

Wouter van Ooijen

-- -------------------------------------------
Van Ooijen Technische Informatica: www.voti.nl
consultancy, development, PICmicro products
docent Hogeschool van Utrecht: www.voti.nl/hvu
 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist