> But I'd still lean toward "natural causes" of an unobserved and
> perhaps not well understood nature.  There were, of course, lots
> of distractions.

I've seen Loose Change and a couple of other films. WTC7 seems,
by their accounts anyway, and judging by the footage, to be only
superficially damaged, if at all. If the structure of it is what they say
it is, ie very well built, then at face value it does seem strange it folded
quicker than Superman on laundry day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loose_Change_(video)

Download sites under External Links or Google



-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist