Tony Smith wrote:
> And presumably it would have worked better if you were higher, being 
> able to
> spot more towers.
>
> That's if there were any towers. Your cell phone won't work in 95% (#
> pulled out of my rear, 99% might be better) as there aren't any towers.
> It's most desert, who needs them? Advertisements say they have >95%
> coverage, and then say that's by population, not area.
>
> How many cell towers were in range of Flight 93's path? Say in a 25k
> corridor?
>
> Tony

Not sure how many towers there are, but Flight 93's path was fairly 
parallel and
about 10 or so miles southwest of the Ohio/Pennsylvania turnpikes from
Cleveland to Pittsburgh. In addition to flying over both of those cities 
metro
areas.

Jim
-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist