BTW, the problem abroad is not an American problem even if we are embroiled 
in it.  The problem is a global problem that dwarfs American national 
involvement.  The great crisis in Iraq at the moment is the Iranian intrigue 
to continue what they were unable to do by the Iran-Iraq war.  The reason 
for the war was the Iranian agents fomenting the same kind of revolution 
that overthrew the Shah in 1979.  By 1980 Saddam Hussein purges the Iranian 
revolutionaries.  Iraqi forces drove the Iranian forces back to Iran but it 
was soon clear that Iraq would fall to the overwhelming numbers of Iranian 
forces.  The US, together with Middle East nations came to the aid of Iraq 
in order to prevent radical Shiite control of Iraq.

Whether or not the US overthrow of Saddam Hussein's Baath government was 
advisable is moot at the moment.  The problem reverts back to the Iran-Iraq 
war.  The consequences of the radical Shiite control of Iraq weighs heavy in 
the future stability of the Middle East and Europe.  It has been the 
European posture the depend on the US and Britain to do the heavy stuff.

I don't wish to step on anyone's feelings here.  Just wish to provide a 
factual basis for consideration.  I have always appreciated your ideas and 
those of others who are inclined to explore political colloquy in a civil 
way. I miss Juan Garfolo's comments.  I think he is brilliant.

Some are opposed to political discussions on the List.  I can appreciate 
that.  However, I think it is healthy to exchange ideas if it is civil and I 
think you contribute much to assuring that that it is.






----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Newtons Massmind" <jamesnewton@massmind.org>
To: "'Microcontroller discussion list - Public.'" <piclist@mit.edu>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 7:28 PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Physics denies official 9/11 report.


>> They are marketing their political agenda.  For my part, I
>> can see right through it and many others can as well.  To
>> allow extremist rhetoric, even to the point that it incites
>> action toward fomenting revolution is one of the trade-offs
>> for freedom.  I do not favor censoring them. You are already
>> responding appropriately by pointing out the logical flaws in
>> their arguments.
>
> At the moment I think we have less of a revolution at home problem and 
> more
> of an invasion abroad problem.
>
> Nothing I've said should push anyone toward revolution and I'm a little
> amazed that it would be taken that way. Perhaps I misunderstand?
>
> All I am trying to "market" is the idea that we should not really be so 
> cock
> sure about who to kill tomorrow. Maybe we don't really know who attacked 
> us
> well enough to be going off and killing ANYONE much less people in some
> forsaken country that had NO responsibility for 9/11 what so ever.
>
> I'm advocating for PEACE here people.
>
> ---
> James.
>
>
> -- 
> http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
> View/change your membership options at
> http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 12/1/2006
> 

-- 
http://www.piclist.com PIC/SX FAQ & list archive
View/change your membership options at
http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/piclist